John Poole was an English Marine Chronometer Maker rated
a little below the elite makers such as Arnold, Earnshaw, Frodsham, Kullberg
and Dent. One reason why he didn’t quite
reach the highest echelon was his relatively short working life – he died aged
just 49. Nowadays, when Poole
chronometers come on the market any brief biographical details added to the
watch’s description almost always include this or something similar: John Poole took his own life in 1867, shortly
after winning the gold medal at the Paris Exhibition.
Much as I’m fascinated by old clocks and watches, I’m
even more intrigued by the people who made them, and I’m always surprised to
see it when a note of this type is merely copied/pasted and no attempt has been
made to understand the ‘why’ behind the factoid. After all, in the more straightforward
society of Victorian England, what on earth would induce a prize-winning man
with a successful business and thriving family to commit suicide?
Having found no indication of the circumstances of
Poole’s death in existing horological research resources/writings, I set about
solving this mystery myself. I’m pleased
that I’ve been able to provide answers, but saddened by Poole’s situation, even at
this distance in time. My findings are
reported in my article on John Poole, published in the August 2016 issue of Clocks Magazine.
The Marine Chronometer is an especially attractive type
of timekeeper. The style of the
instrument itself and the wooden storage box seem to me quintessentially English
and singularly evocative of the nineteenth century. Their aesthetic merits were underpinned by
functional integrity – however good one looked, it would be useless (for its
primary purpose) if it didn’t perform with supreme accuracy. And the accuracy was measured stringently, at
the Greenwich Trials for instance. At
these, in 1845 and again in 1854, Poole chronometers were the outright winners.
Since writing the article I came across this excellent
example, representative of Poole’s output:
Courtesy of Charles
Miller
Eight
day Marine Chronometer, circa 1855 with silvered dial signed John Poole, 57 Fenchurch Street, London,
2702, Maker to the Admiralty, gold hands with blued-steel subsidiaries,
Earnshaw Escapement with Poole's auxiliary compensation set within a
counterweighted and gimbal-mounted bowl within three-tier wooden box with tipsy
key, with numbered maker's plate and inset handles. Offered at auction in May 2016 with an
estimate of £3-5,000.
All week we’ve been showcasing great watches from local brands.These automatic watches for men are very different from the sometimes anonymous products produced in their thousands by the large Swiss brands. These watches are very much the result of an a personal vision.
ReplyDeleteDistinctive watches gentlemen - wishing you success. Regards. David.
DeleteThannks great blog
ReplyDeleteThanks Jean. Regards, David
ReplyDeleteDo you know anything about the John Poole silver hallmark pocket watch no.5105
ReplyDeleteMy mistake it’s 5103
ReplyDeleteSorry John, I don't have anything on that movement number. Hope you have success looking elsewhere. Regards, David
ReplyDeleteHi i have just acquired a John Poole Marine Chronometer number 4194 iam in Australia i belive there is also one in the a Sydney Museum . I would love to know some history of this clock ' are there any records of the ships they were supplied to thanks Paul
ReplyDeleteHello Paul - hope you're enjoying ownership of the chronometer. The closest movement number I know of is #4230 - a typical Poole piece, signed 57 Fenchurch Street, probably circa 1870. If you'd like to find out more about its original use, a very good resource is https://cudl.lib.cam.ac.uk/search?keyword=board%20of%20longitude&page=1&x=0&y=0 Good luck - I hope you'll be able to learn more about it. Regards, David.
ReplyDeleteThanks for responding David ' iam in the UK at the moment and yes really enjoying owning such a great chronometer. i will do some check while iam here thanks Paul
DeleteHello, during your research on John Poole, did you by any chance come across any information about Philip John Butler who worked for John Poole and who I believe ran the business after his death.
ReplyDeleteSorry - I can't offer anything on this name. As far as I've been able to establish, there is no evidence to contradict the conventional wisdom that the the business was continued after John's death by his brother James who, in turn, was succeeded by his son, James Upton. The latter's son, Sidney, was the last in the line in business as a watchmaker. Regards, David
ReplyDelete