In
researching watchmakers of the Georgian and early Victorian era, threads of
information often come to a shuddering halt, especially because of the
lack/non-comprehensiveness of information in publicly accessible records,
censuses for example. As a result I
sometimes discover horological ‘stories’ in which something previously unknown
can be inferred, but not substantiated.
This of course is true for anyone researching and writing about any
historical subject.
Here
I thought I’d let my imagination run free and, rather than avoid speculation,
positively indulge in it. The resulting
account satisfies my preference for a narrative in which ‘human interest’ calls
the tune rather than certainty of fact.
Primarily I hope it will engage readers’ keen interest, but I’d also
stress my willingness to accept informed feedback: if any of my
deductions/inferences are known to be incorrect, I’m very ready to edit and
update the ‘story’.
My
first knowledge of Charles Hanson was an entry in an excellent and quirky book,
‘The Watch Collection of Stanley H
Burton; Warts and all’. On pages 110
– 111 a watch is illustrated and described:
Hanson, Huddersfield. B. 1859. Hallmark Chester 1860. Spring detent escapement, 3.2mm between plates.
No.134.
Milled & engine turned silver case, 48mm
diam. Lunette glass. White enamel dial, 44.6mm diam. Marked
‘Patent Chronometer’. Roman chapters,
gilt fleur de lys hands, secs. 10-60. 3-arm, flat, steel balance. Straight stepped wedge cock. Turned pillars. Diamond endplate, hinged dome. Key size 6.
Regulator: S-F on cock. Going. Rapid beat.
Charles
Hanson was born in Huddersfield in 1801.
With his wife, Mary Ann, Charles had three sons, William, Alfred and
Charles. The family lived at Buxton Road
in the 1840s, Chapel Hill in the 1850/60s and Stables Street subsequently. Alfred – ‘Fred’ – followed his father’s
trade, working as a watchmaker. Charles
died in 1880.
Directory
listings for Charles’s Huddersfield clock and watchmaking business include Cloth
Hall Street (1830) and 100 Northgate (1834/5).
Such was Hanson's ambition and success that he also maintained premises
in High Holborn, London, 1835-42. Later,
in the early 1860s, Hanson was in partnership with Theophilus Murcott at 68
Haymarket, London.
Hanson’s
main claim to horological eminence stems from his acquisition of three patents
in 1845, 1859 and 1875. The first of
these, #10876, has three elements, summarised as follows:
A new type of cylindrical detent vertically
housed between the top and bottom plates
A flat plate detent with central notch and pivots
with support bearings
A spring bearing on the verge shaft in place
of a rigid pallet
Chronometer Movement #28 ©
Trustees of the British Museum
Shown above is an example of Hanson’s pivoted
detent in the collection of The British Museum.
This is an uncased movement, numbered 28 and dated to 1839-45; but note
that within the same catalogue description a later date of circa 1860 is
attributed by Anthony Randall; he also relates this movement to patent # 1950,
(27 August 1859). In the introduction to
this patent, Hanson says, (with some tautology):
This invention is
intended to simplify the chronometer escapement of a watch, and to dispense
with the two springs usually employed at that part of the movement. The Invention consists in the employment of a
pivoted detent acting upon the escape wheel, which is made elastic in such a
manner and with such power as to dispense with the use of the two springs
ordinarily employed as above mentioned in chronometers of the usual
construction.
The patent is illustrated with the diagram
below:
The third horological patent, registered in
the United States in 1875, was concerned with a means of equalising mainspring
power by means alternative to the more troublesome fusee.
To be continued. . .
Your take on the subject is wonderful. I agree with your opinion. Hope to read more on this topic to increase my knowledge in this field.
ReplyDeleteThanks Cavin - much appreciated. Hope you like the 'part 2' post as well. Regards. David.
ReplyDelete