Saturday, 20 February 2016

Function or Fashion?

The original draft of my article on John Grant of Fleet Street, published in the February 2016 issue of Clocks Magazine, included some extensive narrative about and depiction of Benjamin Webb’s Patent Polar Watches.  During the editing process a good deal of this was removed, mainly because of some difficulties experienced with the copyright holders for the images I had intended to use for illustrative purposes.  Subsequently the issue has been resolved – not just in regard to the specific material, but as a broad principle.  As a matter of policy, the Museum of the History of Science, Oxford has now decided to allow images available on its website to be freely downloadable for use by academic publications with a low print-run.

John Grant’s business was distinguished by an innovative approach both to manufacturing and retailing.  This latter aspect was well evidenced by the offering of Webb’s Polar Watches.  These dual-purpose instruments are certainly interesting in their own right.  They are an example of a favourite ‘branch’ of watchmaking of mine: multi-functionality – a trend that emerged in the late 18th/early 19th centuries, including Coach Watches – with four or five time metrics – Chronographs, and such as the Watch-Pedometers of Ralph Gout and Polar Watches of Benjamin Webb. 

I’d like to reproduce here the ‘look’ of the Polar Watches and the related promotional material as I believe it represents the period extremely well:

The Times 9-10-1799
© Museum of the History of Science, University of Oxford
Sotheby’s offered a Polar Watch, #81, at their sale,Important Watches, Clocks and Automata’, 20 October 2009, New York, with an estimate of $5,000-$7,000:
Courtesy of Sotheby’s
This is #146, sold by Sotheby’s in 2002 for £1,292:
Courtesy of Sotheby’s
#45 can be seen on the Antiquorum website.  It is very similar to #81. 
#123 – movement only, is held at The British Museum and further examples are in the Worshipful Company of Clockmakers’ collection, (#129) and York Castle Museum.  According to Paul Tuck, in his ‘Horology Under the Hammer’, Antiquarian Horology, Vol 21, #2, 1993, the Polar Watch featured a Duplex escapement. 
Although Webb liked to feature, ‘The King’s Patent’, prominently, it was not his own.  The reference is to Patent #2280, December 1798, in the name of John Randall Peckham of Bermondsey.
Webb was amongst the Makers quoted in a 1798 Parliamentary Report on the petitions for repeal of the Duties on Clocks and Watches Act 1797.  Webb summarized his loss of business with the following data:






Decrease from 1st July to 31st December:

From January 1st to June 30th





July 1st to December 31st










In the last Four Months




Decrease in:





November  108





December    73





January       78





February    261


Total         520

Webb stated that he had been in business for 27 years and had never before seen such a sudden fluctuation in business volume.  He added that it had become very common to substitute silver/base metal for gold in the making of cases.

Evidence from John Grant was also heard in regard to the Act. 
The Polar Watches are usually ascribed to the dates, circa 1800-05, and evidence of Webb’s subsequent prosperity is lacking.  The British Museum notes him as active up to 1811.  Although the trading title, Benjamin Webb & Son was in use at the time of the marketing of the Polar Watches, little is known about his offspring, James.  Baillie lists him: London (St John’s Sq) 1799.  There is also a Robert with St John’s Sq given as location, and dates 1815-25.
Although the Polar Watch concept and its marketability were unproven, just in case it was about to become highly sought after, the commercially vigilant Swiss were not slow to create similar – though less elegant – similar instruments, this for example:
Courtesy Cogs & Pieces 
The theoretical ‘need’ for Webb’s creation was probably not sustained by practical experience.  The carrying of a compass would not have been especially onerous for a mariner or explorer, used to working with one in any event.  Equally, a relatively small compass housed in tandem with a timepiece would be unlikely to offer the accuracy/stability of a stand-alone instrument.  No doubt there was an initial talking-point value whereby the flourishing of his Polar Watch emphasised the trendiness of a young Gentleman about Town.  However, as the new century got into its stride the underlying quality and elegance of form implied by the term ‘Chronometer’ probably soon attracted the fashion-conscious watch buyer’s attention, at the expense of a ‘novelty’ such as Webb’s.

Wednesday, 10 February 2016

That Arm Must be Tired by Now

I have waited over 60 years to become an owner of one of these, so its arrival in the post today was quite an event:

It reminded me of my excitement when the new issue of the Eagle comic arrived weekly.  In modern parlance, the production values of the Eagle were astonishing in the relatively austere early Fifties.  The use of colour and illustration detail were ground-breaking. 

Dan Dare, on the front cover, was certainly the star turn and amongst the character-branded merchandise, the watch was our Holy Grail of the times.  The sub seconds dial and automaton arm/ray gun added considerable sophistication.
My new acquisition is the earlier version, made in 1953.  The Eagle publishers decided that the Ingersoll dial script was too assertive and ordered a replacement variant where ‘Dan Dare’ was substituted for the maker’s name and ‘Made in Great Britain’ was removed. 

I now need to find an original box – probably much rarer than the watch itself, so I’ve started saving!

© Trustees of the British Museum

Thursday, 4 February 2016

Coach Watch Series - 1: Perigal

Having been so impressed by the Coach Watches of William Carpenter, I’m going to create a series of short posts each with details of such a watch/watches and maker.  The first is a product of Francis Perigal, in collaboration with Markwick Markham, the latter name lending considerable clout for the eastern export markets.  Baillie lists no less than twelve members of the Huguenot Perigal family active in the London watchmaking trade from the beginning of the eighteenth century through to 1840.
Five of the watchmaking Perigals were named Francis, so some confusions of dates/products must be expected.  I believe this Francis (1742-1824), had premises at 57 Bond Street and achieved the status, Watchmaker to the King. 

This Coach Watch is numbered 15407 and likely to be circa 1820.  It features a silver triple case and is a repeater with quarter striking, Petite Sonnerie pattern.  Diameter is 123mm:
Courtesy of Antiquorum

This one is earlier - circa 1780 - again triple-cased and quarter striking, but also with calendar and alarm; dial with Ottoman numerals.  Diameter is 181mm:
Courtesy of Antiquorum